Rush · comparison set
The pages that decide the runtime
Isolated cloud, live steer, a pull request, and a trajectory you can hand to a reviewer. Every page carries the date its facts were read and cites the vendor pages it used.
Rush is our product. These pages put it first, then describe the other runtimes from their own documentation. We do not invent review scores.
Alternatives
Alternatives · verified 15 Sep 2026
Devin alternatives
People search this because they want Devin's job (ticket, isolated cloud, pull request) without locking the Brain to Cognition. Devin did not get worse. The bill, the harness, and the proof object changed.
Alternatives · formerly Background Agents
Cursor Cloud Agents alternatives
Cursor renamed Background Agents to Cloud Agents in the 2.0 changelog (29 October 2025). The job is the same: an isolated VM, the Cursor Agent, a draft PR. Teams look here when they want that job without the Cursor editor as the center of gravity.
Alternatives · not Copilot Workspace
GitHub Copilot cloud agent alternatives
Copilot Workspace was a GitHub Next preview. It ended 30 May 2025. The product that shipped is Copilot coding agent, later renamed Copilot cloud agent in the docs. The job is issue or prompt to an Actions VM to a draft PR. Teams look here when the 59-minute cap, the GitHub-only repo rule, or the Copilot harness is the constraint.
Alternatives · research preview
Claude Code on the web alternatives
Anthropic hosts Claude Code in an isolated VM. You connect GitHub, submit a task, and review the PR. That page is official docs. This page is the commercial map around it: same harness on Rush, or a different harness on someone else's cloud.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Codex cloud alternatives
People look past Codex cloud when they want to start runs from code: the API-key path has no cloud tasks, no GitHub review and no Slack, per OpenAI's own pricing docs.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Factory Droids alternatives
Teams look past Factory Droids when the rolling rate limits are unpublished, or when managed computers start at the $100 Plus plan.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Google Jules alternatives
Teams look past Jules when they need a team plan: paid Jules upgrades are individual Google AI plans for @gmail.com accounts, with no Workspace path yet.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Amp orbs alternatives
Teams look past Amp orbs when they want a pull request by default, a burst above 20 metered orbs, or an agent other than Amp.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
E2B alternatives
Teams look past E2B when they notice most of their code is not the agent. It is templates, key injection, git plumbing, pull request creation and retries around the sandbox.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Daytona alternatives
Teams look past Daytona when the open-source repository went private in June 2026, or when a sandbox stopping mid-process forces them to write keep-alive code.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Modal Sandboxes alternatives
Teams look past Modal Sandboxes when the workload is a coding agent on a repository, and the 24-hour cap, the snapshot dance and the git steps are all code they maintain.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Runloop alternatives
Teams look past Runloop when they wanted the agent run for them, not an SDK to run it with, or when the $250 Pro plan is the first one with suspend and resume.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Vercel Sandbox alternatives
Teams look past Vercel Sandbox when the loop they wrote around it, clone, run Claude Code, push a branch, open a pull request, has become the product they maintain.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Cloudflare Sandbox alternatives
Teams look past Cloudflare Sandbox when the coding agent runner they built from the tutorial stops at a diff, and the commit, pull request and checks are still to write.
Alternatives · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Amazon Bedrock AgentCore alternatives
Teams look past AgentCore when the agent they want is Claude Code or Codex, and the work should end in a pull request rather than an API response they assemble into one.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Railway cloud agents alternatives
People look past Railway cloud agents when they need something to call from code: the agents are interactive VMs in Priority Boarding, with no documented task API or pull request flow.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
OpenHands Cloud alternatives
Teams look past OpenHands Cloud when the free plan's one user and 10 conversations a day runs out and the next step is an Enterprise contract.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Augment Cloud Agents alternatives
Teams look past Augment Cloud Agents when the 40% fee on model usage shows up on the bill, or when the agent they want in the cloud is Claude Code or Codex.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Tembo alternatives
Teams look past Tembo when Pro's five-user cap is too small, or when they want a webhook instead of polling the session for its result.
Alternatives · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Warp Oz alternatives
Teams look past Warp Oz when they need settled limits on a self-serve plan, or a run that keeps its machine between turns instead of a snapshot handoff.
Alternatives · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
CodeRabbit alternatives
Teams look past CodeRabbit when the hourly review cap or the $0.25 per file overage bites, or when they want a review that runs the code instead of reading it.
Alternatives · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Greptile alternatives
Teams look past Greptile when Apex reviews drain seat credits, or when they want the agent that found the bug to fix it in the same run instead of handing it to a local agent.
Alternatives · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Graphite alternatives
Teams look past Graphite's AI reviewer when fixing a finding means buying a Cursor plan as well, or when they want the reviewer to run the code.
Alternatives · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Replit Agent alternatives
Teams look past Replit Agent when the app outgrows the workspace: the code lives in GitHub now, and changes should come back as pull requests started from code, not a chat in a tab.
Alternatives · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Lovable alternatives
Teams look past Lovable when the prototype became a product: it needs work on more than one branch, a repository it did not create, or agents started from code.
Alternatives · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
v0 alternatives
Teams look past v0 when the work stops being a Vercel web app: a backend service, a migration, a report, or a repository that deploys somewhere else.
Head to head
Compare · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs Devin
Both take a task into an isolated cloud machine and aim at a pull request. Devin is Cognition's compound agent. Rush is the runtime for the harness you already pay for.
Compare · formerly Background Agents
Rush vs Cursor Cloud Agents
Same job on paper: isolated VM, unattended work, draft PR. Different engine. Cursor Cloud Agents are Cursor's Agent. Rush is the runtime for Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode.
Compare · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs GitHub Copilot cloud agent
Both can open a GitHub pull request from a task. Copilot cloud agent stays inside GitHub Actions with a 59-minute cap. Rush runs Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode in its own sandbox and keeps the trajectory.
Compare · same harness, different runtime
Rush vs Claude Code on the web
Both run Claude Code in an isolated cloud VM and can open a GitHub PR. Anthropic's product is Claude-only and still a research preview. Rush is a collaborative Project that also runs Codex and OpenCode.
Compare · competitor × competitor
Devin vs Cursor Cloud Agents
Neither of these is Rush. Both sell an autonomous cloud loop. Devin is Cognition's Brain in a Devbox. Cursor Cloud Agents are Cursor's Agent in a Firecracker VM. Pick the agent you already trust.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs Codex cloud
Both run Codex in an isolated cloud machine. OpenAI's runs from ChatGPT; Rush's runs from an API with an API key and comes back with the transcript.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs Factory Droids
Factory sells its own agent, Droid, with persistent computers on the Plus plan. Rush runs Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode, and every run's machine parks between turns.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs Google Jules
Jules is Google's free-to-start agent on GitHub issues. Rush is an API for a team, running Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Rush vs Amp orbs
Amp orbs and Rush runs both keep working when the laptop closes and both park for free. Amp runs Amp; Rush runs Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode and opens the pull request.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs E2B
Rush runs on E2B. One is the sandbox; the other is the agent, the repository steps and the result built on top of it.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Daytona
Daytona hands your code a computer. Rush hands your task to an agent that has a computer, and returns what it made.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Modal Sandboxes
Modal Sandboxes are one product on a GPU and serverless platform. Rush is one job: an agent doing a task and returning it with proof.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Runloop
Runloop is the closest of the sandbox vendors to Rush: it ships Claude Code adapters and an MCP Hub. You still write the agent loop.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Vercel Sandbox
Vercel Sandbox is a microVM you script. Rush is the request that comes back as a pull request.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Cloudflare Sandbox
Cloudflare's own tutorial runs Claude Code in a sandbox and stops at a diff. Rush starts at the same place and ends at the pull request.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Amazon Bedrock AgentCore
AgentCore is the parts to build an agent platform on AWS. Rush is a finished one for a narrower job: an agent doing a task and returning the result.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Railway cloud agents
Railway runs the same CLIs Rush does, on a VM you keep. Rush runs them per task, behind an API, and returns the result.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs OpenHands Cloud
Both run Claude Code and Codex in the cloud and open pull requests. OpenHands is open source; Rush is an API with a self-serve team plan.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Augment Cloud Agents
Augment runs its own agent with its own index and charges a fee on model usage. Rush runs Claude Code, Codex or OpenCode on Rush's models or your own account and meters the sandbox.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Tembo
Tembo is the product closest to Rush: the same harnesses in cloud VMs, a sessions API, pull requests at the end. The differences are price, forges and how a run comes back.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Warp Oz
Warp and Rush both start Claude Code or Codex in the cloud from an API. Warp comes from the terminal; Rush is only the API and what it returns.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs CodeRabbit
CodeRabbit reads the diff and comments. A Rush review run checks out the branch in its own sandbox, can run the tests, and comments with the transcript behind it.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Greptile
Greptile now runs branches in a sandbox too. The difference is what happens after the finding: Greptile hands it to your local agent; a Rush run can fix it where it found it.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Graphite
Graphite is a review workflow; Rush is an agent. They overlap only where Graphite's AI reviewer and Cursor's fix agents do Rush's job.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs Replit Agent
Replit is where an app gets built and hosted. Rush is where an agent works on a repository you already have and hands back the pull request.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Rush vs v0
v0 and Rush both have an API and both open pull requests. v0 is built for Vercel web apps; Rush is built for any task on any repository it can reach.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
E2B vs Daytona
Two sandbox SDKs for AI-generated code. E2B is Firecracker microVMs with memory snapshots; Daytona defaults to containers and adds Windows, macOS and GPU sandboxes.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
E2B vs Modal Sandboxes
E2B is a sandbox company; Modal is a serverless GPU cloud with sandboxes as one product. Modal's own July 2025 roundup compares them.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Daytona vs Modal Sandboxes
Both sell programmable sandboxes per second with GPUs on the price sheet. Daytona defaults to containers; Modal defaults to gVisor.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Vercel Sandbox vs E2B
Both are Firecracker microVM sandboxes with an SDK. Vercel publishes its own Vercel Sandbox vs E2B guide, first published 20 March 2026.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Vercel Sandbox vs Daytona
Vercel Sandbox is Firecracker microVMs billed by active CPU. Daytona is containers by default with VM, Windows, macOS and GPU options.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Cloudflare Sandbox vs Vercel Sandbox
Two platform sandboxes, each next to its own platform: Cloudflare's runs beside Workers and Durable Objects, Vercel's beside Vercel projects.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
E2B vs Cloudflare Sandbox
Both run each sandbox in a Firecracker microVM. E2B is a sandbox SDK on its own; Cloudflare's is driven from a Worker on the Workers Paid plan.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Runloop vs E2B
Runloop sells Devboxes for software engineering agents with credential gateways; E2B sells general microVM sandboxes. Both leave the agent loop to you.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Runloop vs Daytona
Runloop is built for coding agents (Claude Code adapters, MCP Hub); Daytona is general sandboxes with many operating systems.
Compare · Agent sandboxes · verified 17 Oct 2026
Amazon Bedrock AgentCore vs E2B
AgentCore is AWS's platform to host and govern agents, with a microVM per session. E2B is a sandbox SDK. They are compared when a team picks where agent code runs.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
OpenHands Cloud vs Devin
Both take an issue into a cloud sandbox and open a pull request. OpenHands is open source and can run Claude Code or Codex; Devin is Cognition's own agent.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Tembo vs Devin
Tembo runs the coding CLIs you choose on events; Devin runs Cognition's agent. Tembo publishes its own Tembo vs Devin page.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Devin vs GitHub Copilot cloud agent
Devin is Cognition's agent on any major forge. Copilot cloud agent is GitHub's, inside GitHub Actions with a 59-minute cap.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Devin vs Factory Droids
Both sell their own agent across Slack, the web and the IDE, at $20 to start. Devin works in a Devbox per session; Factory adds persistent computers on Plus.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Devin vs Codex cloud
Devin is a product you buy separately; Codex cloud comes with ChatGPT. Both work in an isolated cloud machine and aim at a pull request.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Cursor Cloud Agents vs GitHub Copilot cloud agent
Cursor Cloud Agents move Cursor's Agent into Firecracker VMs; Copilot cloud agent works inside GitHub Actions. Both open draft pull requests.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Claude Code on the web vs Codex cloud
Each model company hosts its own coding agent: Anthropic's Claude Code on the web and OpenAI's Codex cloud, both inside a consumer plan.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Cursor Cloud Agents vs Claude Code on the web
Cursor's cloud runs Cursor's Agent; Anthropic's runs Claude Code. Each is the cloud version of a tool you already use locally.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Codex cloud vs Google Jules
OpenAI's and Google's asynchronous coding agents. Both clone a repository into a cloud machine and propose a pull request.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
GitHub Copilot cloud agent vs Google Jules
Both turn a GitHub issue into a pull request. Copilot works in GitHub Actions; Jules works in a fresh Google Cloud VM.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Warp Oz vs Cursor Cloud Agents
Two developer tools that grew cloud agents: Warp from the terminal, Cursor from the editor.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 15 Sep 2026
Augment Cloud Agents vs Cursor Cloud Agents
Both run their own agent in cloud VMs and open pull requests from tickets and Slack. Augment adds its Context Engine; Cursor brings its editor's Agent.
Compare · Cloud agents · verified 17 Oct 2026
OpenHands Cloud vs Tembo
Both run Claude Code and Codex in the cloud, open pull requests on three forges and have a sessions API. OpenHands is open source; Tembo has more harnesses.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
CodeRabbit vs Greptile
The two AI reviewers developers compare first. Greptile publishes its own Greptile vs CodeRabbit page.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
CodeRabbit vs Graphite
CodeRabbit is a review bot on four forges; Graphite is a GitHub review workflow with AI review built in. Graphite publishes its own comparison.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
Greptile vs Graphite
Greptile reviews against a codebase graph and can run the branch; Graphite is a review workflow whose fixes come from Cursor Cloud Agents.
Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026
CodeRabbit vs Qodo
Both review every pull request on several forges. Qodo adds Gerrit, air-gapped deployment and governance views; CodeRabbit has a free tier for public repositories.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Replit Agent vs Lovable
Two app builders with hosting built in. Replit publishes its own Replit vs. Lovable page.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Replit Agent vs Bolt
Two in-browser builders with hosting. Replit publishes its own Replit vs. Bolt page.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
Lovable vs Bolt
Two chat-driven builders for people who do not write code. Lovable publishes its own Bolt vs. Lovable comparison.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
v0 vs Lovable
Two web app builders with GitHub sync. v0 publishes to Vercel through pull requests; Lovable hosts the app and a backend itself.
Compare · App builders · verified 17 Oct 2026
v0 vs Replit Agent
Both open pull requests on GitHub repositories. v0 targets Vercel web apps; Replit hosts the app in its own workspace.
Reviews
Review · Cognition · 15 Sep 2026
Devin review
Devin is Cognition's autonomous software engineer. It writes and tests in an isolated Devbox and opens a PR on your SCM. The Brain always stays in Cognition's cloud. This page is a review with dates, not a score out of ten.
Review · Anysphere · 15 Sep 2026
Cursor Cloud Agents review
Cloud Agents are Cursor's Agent in isolated VMs. They were Background Agents until Cursor 2.0 (29 October 2025). They can build, test, use a desktop, and open a draft PR. They require a paid Cursor plan.
Best for
Best for · scenario map · 15 Sep 2026
Best cloud coding agents
Most 2026 lists compare editors, terminals, and a single vendor agent. The useful split is the job: isolated cloud, live or unattended steer, a pull request, and what you can show a reviewer when the run stops.
Best for · Claude Code · 15 Sep 2026
Best way to run Claude Code in the cloud
The query 'Claude Code in the cloud' is owned by Anthropic docs. The commercial question is which runtime holds the session: Anthropic, Rush, or GitHub's third-party agent preview.
By role
Leave a vendor
Migrate · Devin → your git remote
How to move off Devin
The durable work is already on your SCM. Devin cannot create new GitHub repositories. Leaving is mostly uninstalling an app and deciding which harness runs the next ticket.
Migrate · Anysphere · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Cursor Cloud Agents to Rush
Cancel in the billing dashboard. Delete the account after cancel (30 days). Project rules in .cursor/rules stay in git. User and team rules are not in profile exports.
Migrate · GitHub · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from GitHub Copilot cloud agent to Rush
Cancel the Copilot plan; you fall back to Copilot Free. Pushed branches stay. GitHub can export account data as tar.gz.
Migrate · Anthropic · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Claude Code on the web to Rush
Delete or archive the session. Export Claude data from Settings → Privacy (personal plans). --teleport pulls the branch and conversation into local CLI.
Migrate · OpenAI · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Codex cloud to Rush
ChatGPT data export (up to 7 days to prepare, 24-hour download). Code already pushed stays on GitHub or GitLab.
Migrate · Factory · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Factory Droids to Rush
Pushed git remotes stay. BYOM keeps your own disk. Official full-account export was not documented on pages retrieved 15 Sep 2026.
Migrate · Google · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Google Jules to Rush
Pushed PRs stay on GitHub. Tasks can be deleted. No documented portable export of Jules session history.
Migrate · Amp Inc. · verified 15 Sep 2026
Migrate from Amp orbs to Rush
Pushed git stays. amp sync mirrors orb files locally. Official full-account export was not on pages retrieved 15 Sep 2026.
Migrate · E2B · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from E2B to Rush
Nothing is locked in: the code is in your repository and the orchestration is yours. Moving to Rush turns that loop into one request.
Migrate · Daytona · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Daytona to Rush
Your code is in your git remote and the loop around Daytona is yours. Moving to Rush replaces that loop with one request that returns the pull request.
Migrate · Runloop AI · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Runloop to Rush
Your code is in your repository and the loop is yours. Moving to Rush replaces the SDK calls with one request that returns the pull request.
Migrate · Vercel · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Vercel Sandbox to Rush
Your repository and orchestration are yours. Moving to Rush replaces the clone, agent and push code with one request that returns the pull request.
Migrate · Cloudflare · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Cloudflare Sandbox to Rush
Your repository and Worker code are yours. Moving to Rush replaces the runner pattern with one request that returns the pull request.
Migrate · All Hands AI · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from OpenHands Cloud to Rush
Repositories, branches and open pull requests stay on your forge. A V1 app-conversations request maps onto a Rush session request.
Migrate · Augment Code · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Augment Cloud Agents to Rush
Branches and pull requests stay on your forge. Experts and triggers are rebuilt as Rush automations or API calls; no export is documented.
Migrate · Ona (formerly Gitpod) · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Ona to Rush
AGENTS.md, branches and pull requests carry over unchanged. Dev Container setup and automations are re-expressed; .ona/mcp-config.json servers become Rush connections.
Migrate · Tembo · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Tembo to Rush
The same harnesses, repositories and pull requests carry over. POST /v1/sessions with description, codeRepositoryIds and agent maps almost field for field onto a Rush session.
Migrate · Warp · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Warp Oz to Rush
Branches and pull requests stay on GitHub. POST /agent/runs maps onto a Rush session; transcripts stay in Warp with no documented export.
Migrate · CodeRabbit · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from CodeRabbit to Rush
AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md rules carry over as they are, since CodeRabbit already reads them. Path instructions in .coderabbit.yaml and Learnings move into AGENTS.md.
Migrate · Greptile · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Greptile to Rush
.greptile/rules.md is plain markdown and moves into AGENTS.md as it is; files.json references become links in it; config.json settings become prose.
Migrate · Replit · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Replit Agent to Rush
Push the Repl to GitHub with Replit's GitHub sync, then connect that repository to Rush. Hosting and the database stay on Replit unless you move them.
Migrate · Lovable · verified 17 Oct 2026
Migrate from Lovable to Rush
Lovable documents the move away: export to GitHub, deploy to your own hosting, and migrate the built-in backend to your own Supabase project.