Compare · AI code review · verified 17 Oct 2026

CodeRabbit vs Qodo

Both review every pull request on several forges. Qodo adds Gerrit, air-gapped deployment and governance views; CodeRabbit has a free tier for public repositories.

Facts checked 17 October 2026. Prices and limits move. Read the citations.

Start a TaskAll comparison pages
Vendor agentDevin · Cursor · Copilot · Julessame jobRushYour harness, isolated, one PR
Isolated sandboxes feeding one pull request

Neither product is ours. Rush is, and it gets one paragraph below. Every cell is from the vendor's own pages.

The short answer

Pick CodeRabbit for a free start and line-by-line review. Pick Qodo for Gerrit, air-gapped deployment and review governance.

Read this first

The useful distinction

CodeRabbit: an AI code reviewer that posts pull request summaries and line comments on GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps and Bitbucket, learns from your team's replies, and can push fixes.

Qodo: an AI code review and governance platform that reviews every pull request on GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Azure DevOps and Gerrit, with single-tenant and on-premises deployment.

Head to head

Buyer questions

QuestionCodeRabbitQodo
What runsModels from OpenAI and Anthropic. Reviews can run shell commands and static analysis; coding tasks run in a sandbox that is in beta.Qodo's reviewer; the models are not named on the pages we read. It can generate and apply a fix.
IsolationHosted by CodeRabbit; customer code is not used for training. Self-hosting needs Enterprise with 500 or more seats.SOC 2 Type II. Single-tenant SaaS, on-premises or air-gapped on Enterprise.
Result and pull requestComments on every pull request. Fix comments pushes a commit to the branch or opens a stacked pull request, on Essentials and up.Reviews when a pull request opens, reopens or is marked ready, on five forges including Gerrit.
MCPMCP client only: it pulls context from MCP servers you add in its web UI (5 to 20 by plan).Not stated on the pages we read.
TeamJira and Linear, Slack, a .coderabbit.yaml in the repository, and Learnings from chat replies. Reads AGENTS.md and CLAUDE.md as review guidelines by default.Jira, Linear, Azure DevOps, Monday.com, GitHub Issues and GitLab Issues. Config in .pr_agent.toml.
Starting priceFree on public repositories; Essentials $24 / developer / month billed annually ($30 monthly)No permanent free tier; 14-day trial; Pro Team listed at $30, for up to 30 users
Where it taps outHourly review caps and $0.25 per reviewed file past the allowance. Self-hosting from 500 seats. Fix comments stops on merge conflicts. Its docs do not say reviews run your tests.No permanent free tier. Pro Team is for up to 30 users. Azure DevOps has no on-premises option.

Decision

When each side wins

CodeRabbit wins when

  • Your repositories are on GitLab, Azure DevOps or Bitbucket, including self-managed versions.
  • You want a mature line-comment UX that learns from your replies.
  • Your open-source project wants free reviews forever.

Qodo wins when

  • You need Gerrit or Azure DevOps, or an air-gapped deployment.
  • You want governance views such as PR triage, review analytics and blast radius.
  • You need SOC 2 Type II.

Rush

Where Rush sits

Rush is an agent, not a reviewer: point an automation at the pull request and it reads, runs the tests and comments.

Honest limits

Skip Rush if

  • Rush runs three agents: Claude Code, Codex and OpenCode. It does not host an agent you wrote yourself.
  • Repositories come through the Rush GitHub App. A GitLab or Bitbucket repository cannot be a run's repository yet.
  • There is no self-hosted or customer-VPC deployment, and we do not publish a compliance report today.
  • Compute is metered. Free includes 5 agent-hours a month and Pro 40, each with a weekly ceiling.
  • You review the pull request. Rush does not merge for you.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

Is CodeRabbit cheaper than Qodo?

List prices, read off each vendor's pricing page on 17 October 2026. CodeRabbit: Free on public repositories; Essentials $24 / developer / month billed annually ($30 monthly). Qodo: No permanent free tier; 14-day trial; Pro Team listed at $30, for up to 30 users. The units differ, so price the job you run, not the plan.

Where does Rush fit next to CodeRabbit and Qodo?

Rush is an agent, not a reviewer: point an automation at the pull request and it reads, runs the tests and comments.

Cluster

Keep reading

Citations

Sources

Every factual claim on this page traces to one of these URLs. Retrieval date is 17 October 2026 unless the source prints an earlier published date.

  1. [1] CodeRabbit, “CodeRabbit Pricing”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://www.coderabbit.ai/pricing
  2. [2] CodeRabbit, “CodeRabbit FAQs”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/faq.md
  3. [3] CodeRabbit, “CodeRabbit docs home”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/
  4. [4] CodeRabbit, “Coding environments”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/code/environments.md
  5. [5] CodeRabbit, “Self-hosted CodeRabbit”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/self-hosted/overview.md
  6. [6] CodeRabbit, “Fix comments”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/finishing-touches/autofix.md
  7. [7] CodeRabbit, “MCP Servers”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/knowledge-base/mcp-context.md
  8. [8] CodeRabbit, “Code guidelines”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.coderabbit.ai/knowledge-base/code-guidelines.md
  9. [9] Qodo, “Qodo Pricing”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://www.qodo.ai/pricing/
  10. [10] Qodo, “Qodo homepage”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://www.qodo.ai/
  11. [11] Qodo, “Qodo docs”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.qodo.ai/
  12. [12] Qodo, “Deployment model support”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.qodo.ai/code-review/deployment-model-support
  13. [13] Qodo, “Use Qodo in PRs”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.qodo.ai/code-review/use-qodo-in-prs
  14. [14] Qodo, “Ticketing integrations”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://docs.qodo.ai/code-review/integrations/ticketing-integrations
  15. [15] Rush, “Rush product requirements”, retrieved 2026-09-15. https://getrush.ai/cloud
  16. [16] Rush, “Rush pricing (live contract on getrush.ai)”, retrieved 2026-09-15. https://getrush.ai/pricing
  17. [17] Rush, “Isolation, plainly”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://getrush.ai/docs/concepts/isolation
  18. [18] Rush, “Results and proof”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://getrush.ai/docs/concepts/results-and-proof
  19. [19] Rush, “Usage and billing”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://getrush.ai/docs/concepts/usage-and-billing
  20. [20] Rush, “Rush MCP server”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://getrush.ai/docs/concepts/mcp-server
  21. [21] Rush, “Automations”, retrieved 2026-10-17. https://getrush.ai/docs/concepts/automations

Next

Run the next Task on Rush

Connect a repository. Pick Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode. Review the PR.

How the runtime works